California's Threatened Environment
Health Risks in California
65% breathe air classified as ‘unhealthy’ or worse
183,651 people drink water with a health violation
15% of surface waters impaired or threatened
30 fish consumption advisories issued
96 Superfund sites exist (designated by the federal government as the most polluted sites in the country)
97% live in an area with 100 times the cancer risk goal set by the Clean Air Act
89% live in an area with a worse risk of non-cancer healthproblems than the goal set by the Clean Air Act
588,574 children have asthma
Newer California Law Allows coal fired plants to expand without putting modern pollution control equipment in place, which would significantly reduce mercury and other emissions.Mercury also enters the water, contaminating commonly-eaten fish.
The newer standard for arsenic in drinking water, permits higher levels.
Arsenic, while naturally occurring, is also a toxic release from mining and manufacturing, and is believed to
cause several different types of cancer as well as a host of other diseases.
The $2.8-trillion budget for the 2007 fiscal year, cut spending in non-security discretionary programs below 2006 levels.
For the Environmental Protection Agency, this meant a budget cut by about 4% from $7.6 billion in FY 2006 to $7.3 billion in 2007—the lowest budget amount in 10 years.
The EPA 2006-2007 budget includes a request for $184 million for EPA Homeland Security efforts, an increase of $55 million (43%) over the FY 2006 enacted budget. This funding includes $33 million to protect drinking water from terrorist attack; and $10 million to develop Environmental Laboratory Preparedness and Response capability; $10 million to provide for environmental decontamination, including related research and development.
The largest new program in the EPA budget is the Diesel Emissions Reduction Program, with a budget request of $49.5 million. Congress, however, in passing the Diesel Emissions Reduction Act (DERA), had authorized an annual expenditure of $200 million—a point Allen Schaeffer, executive director of the Diesel Technology Forum, made clear in a statement concerning the budget submission.
While $50 million is a solid start, we urge Congress to finance this important clean air program at $200 million as originally authorized.
—Allen Schaeffer
Other gains in the EPA were:
-
$38 million in underground storage tank funding, a $26 million increase over FY 2006 enacted levels, to prevent future releases from such tanks;
-
$11 million for the development and implementation of the renewable fuel standard which leads to increasing market share of ethanol and renewable fuels;
-
$1.3 billion for the Superfund program, a $17 million increase over last year's enacted budget. The program will achieve 40 construction completions.
The largest program cut is a $199-million reduction (22.5%) in low-interest loans to states for water quality protection projects. The second largest is a 16%, $35-million cut in state land local air quality management programs.
The voluntary Climate Protection Program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions faces a 5%, $5-million cut.
The administration said the main priorities at EPA were reducing diesel pollution, decreasing leaks from underground storage tanks, and “developing the necessary tools and protocols to mitigate the environmental and human health effects of chemical, biological or radiological attacks.”
EPA shares in the responsibility of being good stewards of our nation’s environment, and good stewards of our nation’s tax dollars.
This budget fulfills every presidential environmental commitment and maintains the goals laid out in EPA’s Strategic Plan, while spending less.
—EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
Resources: